बी०एल०ओ० (BLO) ड्यूटी पर रोक लगाए जाने सम्बन्धी मा० उच्च न्यायालय का नवीनतम आदेश देखें

बी०एल०ओ० (BLO) ड्यूटी पर रोक लगाए जाने सम्बन्धी मा० उच्च न्यायालय का नवीनतम आदेश देखें

बी०एल०ओ० (BLO) ड्यूटी पर रोक लगाए जाने सम्बन्धी मा० उच्च न्यायालय का नवीनतम आदेश देखें (आदेश दिनाँक 10 दिसम्बर 2019 )

बी०एल०ओ० (BLO) ड्यूटी पर रोक लगाए जाने सम्बन्धी मा० उच्च न्यायालय का नवीनतम आदेश देखें (आदेश दिनाँक 05 नवम्बर 2019)

Court No. - 2

Case:- WRIT - A No. - 16850 of 2019

Petitioner:- Satish Kumar And 8 Others

Respondent:- State Of U.P. And 2 Others

Counsel for Petitioner:- Navin Kumar Sharma

Counsel for Respondent:- C.S.C.,Yatindra

Hon'ble Suneet Kumar, J.

Connect this case along with the records of Writ Petition No. 60068 of

2016 (Shaheen Praveen vs. State of U.P. and others). 

Respondents are allowed four weeks' time to file counter affidavit, two

weeks' thereafter is allowed to the petitioner to file rejoinder affidavit. 

List thereafter before the Court having jurisdiction. 

The contention of the learned counsel for the petitioner is that the

petitioners are working as Assistant Teacher in Junior/Senior Basic

Schools run by Basic Education Board in District Bulandshahr. The

provisions of Intermediate Act, 1921 is applicable. Petitioners are

aggrieved by the impugned order (annexure-1 to the writ petition) passed

by the third respondent, Sub Divisional Magistrate/Election Registration

Officer, Bulandshahr, requisitioning the duty of the petitioners as Booth

Level Officer for revision of the voter-list. Learned counsel for the

petitioner has placed reliance on the Division Bench decision rendered in

Sunita Sharma vs. State of U.P. and others: 2015 (3) ESC 1289 (All)

(DB) to contend that the requisition of the petitioners is illegal and in teeth

of the provisions of Section 27 of the Right of Children to Free and

Compulsory Education Act, 2009. 

Submission requires consideration. 

Till the next date of listing, effect and operation of the impugned order

(annexure-1 to the writ petition), shall remain stayed. It is directed that in

the meantime, the petitioner shall not be forced to perform the duty of

Booth Level Officer by the respondents without the leave of the Court.

Order Date:- 05-11-2019

Mukesh Kr.